Top 20 Mux Alternatives of 2024

The need to have all your streaming media and services under one roof is becoming a priority for organizations in 2024. Mux is one of the platforms that enable developers to build live and on-demand video experiences in its apps, but it can be costly, and its features are somewhat limited.

Many reliable contenders in the streaming industry offer services that match and exceed that of Mux.

With that in mind, we've compiled a list of the top 20 best Mux alternatives to help you integrate live video into your application as quickly and efficiently as possible! This list features some of the most reliable and flexible options available. So grab a seat, look at our definitive list of Mux alternatives for 2024, and get ready for an intuitive streaming experience.

What to Look for in an Alternative for Mux?

Here are some of the crucial things to consider when you are out looking for a Mux alternative:

SDK Capabilities: Look for a streaming platform that offers capabilities such as cross-browser compatibility and custom video layouts.
Unique Features: Find one with special features, such as audio-only calling or recording capabilities that add value to your live streams.
Interactive Elements: Consider whether the platform has interactive features like chat, screen-sharing, and on-screen comments or captions.
Streaming Quality: Ensure the streaming quality is high and reliable with no latency issues, even if the network fluctuates.
Integrations: Check that the platform offers open APIs that make it easy for you to integrate it with your app and various social media/online platforms for maximum reach.
Pricing: Review pricing plans to ensure they are within your budget.
UX: See if the SDK offers easy-to-use UI elements you can pick and stitch together to quickly build the user interface for your live experience.
Support: Lastly, please ensure the platform offers excellent customer support if you need help with any issues.

By looking out for these features in a Mux alternative, you can rest assured that you'll find the best solution for your live streaming needs. A suitable streaming platform can help you boost your live video's performance and reach, so consider all these factors before deciding.

The Top 20 Alternatives to Mux

There are the top 20 alternatives to Mux including Dyte, OnTheFly, Zoom Video SDK, Agora, Twilio, EnableX, Vonage Video, AWS Chime SDK, Whereby, Daily WebRTC, Restream, Jitsi, Janus, Sinch, Apphitech, PubNub, QuickBlox, Wowza, Sendbird and HippoVideo.

Let's talk about offering their unique features, advantages, and pricing for each of them.

Dyte
OnTheFly
Zoom Video SDK
Agora
Twilio
Enablex
Vonage Video
AWS Chime
Whereby
Daily WebRTC
Restream
Jitsi
Janus
Sinch
Apphitect
PubNub
QuickBlox
Wowza
Sendbird
HippoVideo

Reviews of Mux alternatives for building live video call experiences in your product

Below we'll review each alternative solution to give you a better overview of Mux's competitors and their pricing. All reviews highlight our findings and the considerations of real users.

Dyte

Dyte is an alternative to Mux for running large-scale live streams online. It offers powerful features and a simple setup process, and its capabilities include adaptive streaming, multi-bitrate streaming, and transcoding.

Dyte offers developer-friendly live video conferencing SDKs that enable you to effortlessly integrate 1:1 calls, group calls, and webinars into your platform. Because of its low-code approach and user-friendly documentation, one can go live with fewer lines of code. It supports live classes, telemedicine, online fitness, remote employment, social gatherings, dating, and B2B sales use cases.

Pros:

The SDK offers extensive collaborative features out of the box
It is super easy to integrate your product with its open APIs
It provides detailed analytics on video call metrics
It lets you do cross-platform streaming across YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook, and more with RTMP built-in the platform
Participants have almost no voice and video lag, so they may readily communicate with one another
The SDK barely weighs ~200 KB GZIP, which makes it super easy on your user's network and their devices
The team offers free 24*7 support at the channel of your choice — email, Slack, Discord, and more
You can easily use the ready-made plugins available to make the user's streaming experience interactive

Cons:

Currently, the SDK can support a maximum of 25 active speakers. However, the Dyte team is still working on upgrading these minor drawbacks

Pricing:

10,000 free minutes every month
$0.001/min/user for Voice Conferencing
$0.004/min/user for Video Conferencing

Dyte is well known for its ease of use, customer support, feature set, design, pricing, benefits, and community. With Dyte, you can be sure of a flexible streaming solution tailored to your needs and budget, with excellent customer support if any issues arise. Get the most out of your live streams today. Dyte offers secure streaming and encryption, ensuring your content is safe and private.

OnTheFly

A highly powerful Live-streaming platform by OnTheFly that is ideal for content creators and businesses. It deals with streaming live videos and communication centered features to boost online viewership.

With OnTheFly, you can start live streaming on the go without the need to download additional plugins, software, or apps. Since it is a web-based platform, you can just sign in and go live.

Features

Studio grade recording
High resolution streaming
Embed URL
Multisharing
Real-time viewing
Zero app installation
Webinars and Podcast streaming
Multistreaming to almost all popular social media platforms
Customizable pricing plans

Cons:

Not supportive of e-commerce
Streaming pre-recorded videos is still under development.

Pricing

OnTheFly offers various subscription plans based on client’s needs. To get to know them in detail, connect with their support team onthefly.stream.

Zoom Video SDK

Zoom Video SDK helps you add live video to your app backed by the servers and technology of Zoom. The SDK provides video, audio, screen sharing, chat, data streams, and more as a service. You can build with all of these features or pick and choose. The Video SDK also has full server-side APIs and webhooks.

Pros:

Build customizable video compositions
Host up to 1,000 co-hosts/participants per session
It supports seven major languages and provides open translation extensibility which opens any app to international growth and improved user experience
Stream your meetings/webinars on Facebook

Cons:

Doesn’t offer prebuilt UI kits to ease development
You need to pay hundreds of dollars to get support from an actual real human being
Restrictive to video calls—no audio calling possible
No interactive features like polls, emoticons, and whiteboard
Expensive subscriptions and add ons
HD video is not the Standard quality
Limited customization to the live video
The SDK only allows the use of predetermined roles of a host and participant

Pricing:

10,000 minutes free every month
$0.35/min/user for Video Conferencing
Recordings $100 per month for 1 TB of storage
Telephony at $100 per month

If you find yourself stuck in a loop of Zoom fatigue after using Zoom's video conferencing, we have curated a list of great Zoom alternatives.

Agora

Agora provides a Real-time Engagement Platform as a Service (RTE PaaS). The SDK provider wants to allow anybody to communicate with anyone, in any application, at any time, and from any location. Its platform provides developers with APIs enabling them to embed real-time video and voice engagement experiences into their products.

Pros:

Agora uses its own priority networking, and the service quality is much superior to Mux
Additional functions include cloud recording and live broadcasting

Cons:

It is tough to absorb documentation rapidly. To grasp the whole context, you may need to reread multiple times. Some information is scattered across several pages
You need to consider different pricing for just about everything— video, voice, whiteboard, or plugins. It charges for everything separately, which makes pricing considerably complex
Actual code may behave differently than the documentation indicates. To cover edge scenarios, a lot of black-box testing is required
The SDKs are really basic, and a lot of manual plumbing or copy-pasting is required for a basic example to function
Poor Slack assistance from the Agora staff; responses frequently take days
Higher-resolution streams become significantly more expensive
To add chat or message passing, you must combine two independent items

Pricing:

$0.0009 /min/user for Voice Conferencing
$0.0039 /min/user for HD Video Conferencing
$0.0089 /min/user for Full HD Video Conferencing

If you're interested in delving deeper, we've written a comprehensive article on Agora pricing that provides an in-depth analysis.

Twilio Live

Twilio is gaining traction as an alternative to Mux for live video. It provides businesses with a wide range of attractive features, such as the ability to embed audio and video into applications, real-time access analytics, and secure data with end-to-end encryption.

Pros:

Twilio Video SDK is designed to integrate easily with any web or mobile application
The highly scalable platform allows applications to handle thousands of users without issues
Twilio Video SDK works seamlessly across multiple platforms, including the web, iOS, and Android
It features a dashboard to track and analyze errors

Cons:

Supports a maximum of 50 hosts within a call
Doesn't offer any plugins for ease of product development
Developers need to spend a lot of time to integrate it since the documentation is old and support is non-existent
No UI elements available — build everything from scratch
Embed multiple SDKs just to create a basic live experience
RTMP streaming isn't available, and you need to sort out HLS separately

Pricing:

$0.004/min/user for Video Conferencing
Recordings cost starts at $0.004/min + recording compositions at $0.01/min

Learn more about Twilio Video pricing.

Twilio is sunsetting Twilio Video, so we've curated a handy list of the top 15 Twilio Video Alternatives and replacements. Here's a step-by-step guide to migrate from Twilio video.

Enablex

Enablex is another alternative to Mux for video streaming. It provides features such as scalability, low-latency video, and real-time analytics. It allows businesses to customize their individual usage plans to fit their needs and budget. Additionally, it offers streaming services with low latency, so viewers don't experience buffering or lagging issues.

Pros:

It is straightforward to use the API
You can use its visual building to customize your video meeting UI — add logos, play with colors, and experiment with different UI elements
Control user access with moderated entry, room lock, floor access control, and viewer role. All video/audio signals are also encrypted
EnableX helps in implementing the Cordova plugin for both iOS and Android

Cons:

The issue with using web-based API in terms of video quality and user interface
The support can take over 72 hours to respond
The pricing can get out of hand very quickly

Pricing:

$0.004/min/user for up to 50 participants/room
For pricing with over 50 participants, you need to contact its sales team
Recording at $0.10/min/user
Transcoding at $0.10/min
Storage at $0.05/GB/month
RTMP streaming costs $0.10/min

Vonage Video

TokBox (now known as Vonage Video SDK) is another alternative for Mux. It runs on root servers on a small scale and can be quickly scaled to meet the demands of organizations, national data centers, or ISPs.

Pros:

The SDK lets you build custom audio/video streams with effects, filters, and AR/VR on mobile devices. It supports use cases ranging from 1:1 video, group video chat, or large-scale broadcast sessions
The SDK offers performance data through the account dashboard or its insights API
It encrypts all voice, video, and signaling traffic with AES-128 or AES-256 encryption

Cons:

Due to its complexity, it requires significant technical expertise to set up and use TokBox
Video conferences can accommodate up to 25 users, which can be a problem if you plan to invite a large number of participants or live stream
The SDK doesn't let you configure live video calls
You can't add more features on top of live video because the platform doesn't offer plugins or allow you to integrate with third-party services easily
The support takes a while (sometimes over 72 hours for a reply), and you can only reach out reliably via email

Pricing:

Plans start at $9.99/month (plus taxes & fees as applicable), with 2,000 minutes included in all plans. $ 0.00395 per participant / per minute after the 2,000 minutes are consumed
Learn more about Vonage Video pricing here.

AWS Chime

Amazon Chime is an Amazon Web Services communications service with a VoIP solution. Amazon Chime is a pay-as-you-go service that can be used for online meetings, video conferencing, and business calls.

Amazon Chime Voice Connector is a service that transmits voice communications over the internet and scales to meet capacity requirements as part of Amazon Chime. Users can remove fixed telephone network costs and simplify voice network administration by moving their voice network to the AWS Cloud.

Pros:

Uses AWS Identity and Access Management policies for security
Includes collaborative features like screen-sharing
Using the SDK, you can chat with people inside and outside of your organization
The SDK offers simulcast — which lets the user’s device pick up the resolution best suited for their network
Amazon Chime SDK encrypts all the calls, videos, and chats

Cons:

It can host up to 25 participants only (50 on mobile)
It lacks some useful features like polling, auto-sync with Google Calendar, and a background blur effect
It doesn’t work well in a Linux environment
Supports audio recording content only in .m4a format
The pricing can get out of control very quickly as you scale

Pricing:

Free tier: Includes one-on-one audio and video calls and group chat
Plus tier: $2.50/user/month
Pro tier: $15/user/month

Whereby

Whereby is another alternative to Mux. It provides browser-based permanent rooms, hybrid setups, interactive whiteboards, and support for up to 50 participants. Additionally, Whereby offers audio/video streaming and recording capabilities so users can broadcast and capture their sessions. Furthermore, it has a built-in chat feature allowing users to communicate during meetings.

Pros:

No need to install a client to manage calls
Good stability and audio quality
GDPR compliant

Cons:

Very basic video customizations
Issues with dropping off
Switching between small and big rooms can be confusing

Pricing:

Free: Supports up to 4 participants and 1 room
Pro: $9.99/month with up to 12 participants and three rooms
Business: Starting with $59.99/month with up to 12 participants and multiple users and team rooms

Daily WebRTC

Daily WebRTC offers features such as cross-browser compatibility and custom video layouts. It also supports up to 10,000 participants in a single call and does not require users to download any software to their devices to use it so that it can be used across different platforms easily.

Pros:

Supports native mobile libraries
Offers collaborative features like HD screen sharing, breakout rooms, and more
Access logs around an event and media quality metrics
APIs are available for Javascript, Flutter, iOS, and Android platforms
You can monitor call performance and user engagement by examining logs and analytics.

Cons

Incertitude regarding the future codecs
The project’s mobile SDK is still in development
Support can take time to resolve issues
Costly video recording cost.

Pricing

10,000 free minutes/month
$0.004/min/user for the video
$0.015/min for RTMP output
$ 0.01349/min for cloud recording

Restream

Restream allows you to broadcast to over 30 social media platforms from one screen, and it's an upcoming competitor of Mux. It enables you to start the live stream directly from your browser without using third-party programs, schedule a pre-recorded video to be played anytime, and invite remote guests from any location to your live stream.

Pros:

Restream offers a forever-free plan
You can use Restream to upload and broadcast pre-recorded videos
Restream includes a talking function to enhance video engagement with chat discussions
The analytics engine tracks all essential metrics to provide insights into your streaming channels, viewership, followers, and chats

Cons:

Users need to pay $49 per month to get full HD streaming
Restream does not support 2K and 4K video streaming
The number of pre-recorded films you can store and the duration and size of each upload are limited
Pre-recorded video streaming is only available to users on the professional plan or higher
Priority customer service is only available to company users on the Premium and Business programs

Pricing:

$16 per month for Standard Plan
$41 per month for a Professional Plan

Jitsi

Jitsi comprises open-source projects that offer the necessary tools for integrating video conferencing solutions into applications. Within the platform, Jitsi Meet, a JavaScript application, facilitates real-time video conversations, collaboration, and screen sharing for users.

Pros

Multi-platform support
No meeting duration limits
Adaptive bitrate

Cons

Limited features
Limited customizations
Public Server limitations

Pricing

While Jitsi is completely open-source and available for unrestricted use and development without cost, users are responsible for setting up their servers and creating their user interface from scratch. Moreover, there is an extra charge for product support.

Learn more about Jitsi Pricing

Janus

Janus is an open-source WebRTC server that helps developers easily add real-time communication capabilities to their applications. With a variety of adaptable options, it caters to a wide range of application needs.

Pros

Supports multiple device applications
Allows Customizations
Community support from developers

Cons

Complex configuration due to flexibility
The learning curve in its documentation
Dedication is required for a deep understanding
Limited built-in analytical support
Complex User interface

Pricing

Janus WebRTC pricing varies based on use cases, scale, and customization needs. While Janus is open-source, costs may arise from implementation, hosting, maintenance, and additional features. Operational expenses should include a $3 per 1000 minutes per month pricing model for similar services. Running Janus on cloud platforms like Google Cloud Compute incurs variable costs tied to resources and bandwidth. For precise pricing, consult Janus creators, or explore commercial support options like managed WebRTC.

Here's a comparison between Raw WebRTC vs. Dyte

Sinch

Sinch Video SDK is a toolkit for software developers to incorporate video communication into their applications. It encompasses functions like video and audio communication, screen sharing, recording, and managing multiple video streams simultaneously.

Pros:

Cross-Platform Support
Customizable UI/UX
Recording capability
Screen-share functionality

Cons:

Integration challenges with certain tech-stacks
Limited customization for specific use cases
Limited advanced features
Documentation isn't as in-depth

Pricing

Sinch uses a pricing structure that varies by location and features. Costs may differ across regions and continents based on functionalities. For accurate pricing tailored to your needs, reach out to their sales team directly.

Apphitech

Apphitect is as a digital services supplier offering a wide range of solutions, such as a video SDK. The organization has solidified its position as a key contributor in the tech industry of the UAE by delivering personalized chat services compatible with Android, iOS, and web apps.

Pros

Great support
Customization available

Cons

Complex integration leading to higher development time
Lacks features as compared to other peers
Does not support all platforms and devices

Pricing

Apphitect video SDKs are not easily found on the internet. The company provides a tailored solution, indicating that pricing probably fluctuates based on individual client needs and specifications.

PubNub

PubNub's Video SDK is a tool with various features for real-time video communication in apps. Includes real-time data streaming, global data center scalability, automatic encryption for security, presence detection for active users, channel multiplexing, storage for past messages, and access management controls.

Pros

Live video
Live streaming
Supports different platforms

Cons

Complex integration
Limited customizations
Users have reported quality issues

Pricing

PubNub's pricing varies based on usage scale. They offer a free plan for up to 200 Monthly Active Users (MAUs). A starter plan is available at $49 per month for up to 1,000 MAUs, with custom pricing for larger audiences. PubNub SDKs are free and open-source MIT licensed. Costs may be incurred when scaling applications for larger audiences. The final cost depends on various factors; contacting PubNub directly is recommended for accurate information.

QuickBlox

QuickBlox offers a cloud communication backend with an SDK for developers to add video calls, messaging, and notifications. It supports iOS, Android, and web platforms for seamless app development across devices and systems.

Pros

Live video calling
File sharing
HIPAA, SOC-2, and GDPR compliant

Cons

Limited customizations
Unclear documentation
Varying performance across platforms

Pricing

QuickBlox's Video SDK pricing varies. The 'Basic' plan is free for 500 users monthly. The 'Starter' plan supports 10,000 users for 3 months. The 'Growth' plan covers 25,000 users over 6 months. Custom needs are met by the 'HIPAA Cloud' and 'Enterprise' plans for up to 20,000 users. While video calling is free, heavy usage may lead to costs. A separate subscription is needed for the video conferencing solution.

Wowza

Wowza Video SDK provides tools for developers to integrate advanced video streaming into apps. It caters to various use cases, from browser-based broadcasting to real-time streaming, offering scalability and flexibility. Detailed documentation ensures efficient feature utilization.

Pros:

Adaptive bitrate streaming
Cross-platform compatibility

Cons:

Limited in-built analytics
Customization complexity

Pricing

Wowza's Video SDK offers various pricing options, including a $25/month basic plan, a one-time $295 Streaming Engine, volume plans from $12 per TB, and premium plans starting at $15 per TB. Custom pricing is available for enterprises. The AWS marketplace charges $85 monthly. Costs vary based on usage.

Sendbird

Sendbird's Video SDK aims to differentiate in the competitive video communication market but falls short in some aspects. It offers features like top-notch voice/video calls, seamless integration with web/mobile apps, live streaming, and limited customization for tailored video views.

Pros:

Zero downtime reports in the last 2 years
ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance
Easily scalable across 6 global regions with stable transmission
Offers advanced functions like video frame capture, custom sound effects, call events integration with chats, and call quality scoring

Cons:

It has a dated user interface
Environment configuration options are somewhat limited
The SDK does not provide comprehensive call analytics
Limited customization

Pricing

Sendbird's video SDK pricing varies based on usage: $0.0014 per minute for initial tier, then $0.0035 and $0.0059 per minute for subsequent tiers. These rates cover high-quality video calling features, scalable to meet demand. For detailed pricing plans, visit Sendbird's official pricing page for free trial options and additional services.

HippoVideo

Hippo Video SDK allows developers and businesses with seamless video integration for applications and websites making it a great Mux alternative. From recording to sharing, it offers enhanced communication experiences. Ideal for customer support, testimonials, and marketing strategies, it supports diverse use cases. With strong documentation, customization, and support, it maximizes video content potential.

Pros:

Easy exporting and sharing
Cross-platform integrations

Cons:

Limited customization
Limited access control

Pricing

HippoVideo Video SDK lacks transparent pricing on its website, prompting consultation for details. Offers a 14-day trial, but short for thorough evaluation. General pricing for other services ranges $0-$80/month, unclear if it applies to SDK. Ambiguity may deter potential users.

Final Verdict

All in all, all of these live video streaming alternatives come with their advantages and disadvantages. It is essential to consider your needs and budget when deciding which streaming solution will work best for you.

But at the end of the day, Dyte emerges as an excellent choice for creating a reliable live video in your application. It's open APIs and prebuilt UK kit makes it particularly easy for developers to access powerful live video conferencing APIs and ensure consistent performance with reliable streaming solutions.

Whether you are looking for high-speed mobile broadcasting or large-scale web conferencing solutions – Dyte ticks all the boxes! So now is the time; sign up for Dyte today and experience our world-class streaming capabilities first-hand!